Very vs Spyrosoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Very (4.2/5) edges ahead of Spyrosoft (4.1/5) overall. Very is the better choice for funded US product teams, platform-heavy IoT. Spyrosoft is the stronger option for embedded and automotive teams at Polish rates. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Very vs Spyrosoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Very | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2016 |
| HQ | Bozeman, Montana, United States (distributed) | Wrocław, Poland |
| Team size | 150–250 | 1,500+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering | Large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group |
| Pricing model | Time and materials | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $250,000 | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C, Elixir, Nerves | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, Qt |
| Industries served | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture | Automotive, Industrial equipment, Healthcare, Energy |
Very vs Spyrosoft: overview
Very
Very was founded in 2011 by Ben Wald and started out building software and websites before settling on IoT. Its staff work remotely across the US, with Bozeman, Montana listed as its base, and Built In counts 193 employees. The company covers hardware prototyping, firmware, IoT platforms and apps. Its Clutch profile lists a $250,000 minimum project size and $200 to $300 hourly rates.
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Wrocław, with a UK arm in Dorset. Estimates of its headcount range from about 800 to 1,900. Embedded software, automotive and industrial systems make up a large share of its work, next to general cloud and web development. It is listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange.
Services and capabilities: Very vs Spyrosoft
| Capability | Very | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Very vs Spyrosoft
| Framework / platform | Very | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | ✓ |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Very vs Spyrosoft
| Criterion | Very | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $250,000 | Not published |
| Engagement models | Time and materials, Team extension | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Very vs Spyrosoft
| Dimension | Very | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics | Automotive, Industrial equipment, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team., An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | An automotive supplier needs an HMI team., An industrial firm wants Qt interfaces for machines. |
| Typical project type | Time and materials | Dedicated team |
Very vs Spyrosoft: pros and cons
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | US-based engineers and product managers |
| + | Strong on cloud platforms and data, not just devices |
| + | Experience taking products from prototype to launch |
| - | $250,000 minimum and $200 to $300 hourly rates rule out most small projects |
| - | Less electronics design depth than dedicated hardware houses |
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff sizeable embedded teams quickly |
| + | Public company, so finances are visible |
| + | Polish location suits EU buyers |
| - | Rapid growth means varying maturity between units |
| - | Little in-house electronics design |
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: a funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team.
US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Minimum engagement starts at $250,000. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture.
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: an automotive supplier needs an HMI team.
Large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Industrial equipment, Healthcare, Energy.
Decision matrix: Very vs Spyrosoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Spyrosoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Very ($250,000) vs Spyrosoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Very |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Very |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Very |
Use case fit: Very vs Spyrosoft
| Use case | Very fit | Spyrosoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team. | Strong | Limited | Very |
| An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | Strong | Limited | Very |
| An automotive supplier needs an HMI team. | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| An industrial firm wants Qt interfaces for machines. | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Limited | Very |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Very vs Spyrosoft
Very (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering.
Spyrosoft (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an industrial firm wants Qt interfaces for machines. If your situation matches that, Spyrosoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Very vs Spyrosoft FAQ
Is Very better than Spyrosoft?
Very (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Very's strongest advantage: US-based engineers and product managers. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: can staff sizeable embedded teams quickly.
How do Very and Spyrosoft differ in pricing?
Very uses time and materials pricing with a minimum engagement of $250,000. Spyrosoft uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Very or Spyrosoft?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Very and Spyrosoft?
Very's primary differentiator is: US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group. They also differ in team size (150–250 vs 1,500+), minimum engagement ($250,000 vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial equipment, Energy vs Automotive, Industrial equipment).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.