Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Spyrosoft (4.1/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected products needing hardware, firmware and cloud. Spyrosoft is the stronger option for embedded and automotive teams at Polish rates. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2016 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in London, Hamburg, Kraków) | Wrocław, Poland |
| Team size | 200+ | 1,500+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company | Large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, RTOS, Embedded Linux | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, Qt |
| Industries served | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment | Automotive, Industrial equipment, Healthcare, Energy |
Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Few IoT vendors can design the circuit board, write the RTOS firmware, program an FPGA and build the cloud back end without subcontracting part of it. Lemberg Solutions does all of that with 200+ engineers, working since 2007 from Lviv and Kraków with client-facing offices in London and Hamburg. Its connectivity and edge AI work is backed by partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics, plus an in-house lab for prototyping and testing. Clients include Bosch Rexroth, Astronics, Caltech, Cellink, Ferno and Speede.
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Wrocław, with a UK arm in Dorset. Estimates of its headcount range from about 800 to 1,900. Embedded software, automotive and industrial systems make up a large share of its work, next to general cloud and web development. It is listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy | Automotive, Industrial equipment, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard., An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | An automotive supplier needs an HMI team., An industrial firm wants Qt interfaces for machines. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help with early silicon access and vendor support |
| + | In-house lab shortens the loop between a prototype failing a test and a fix being tried |
| + | Builds products to the relevant industry standards and protocols, with ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification behind its security and quality processes |
| + | Edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need to decide locally instead of sending everything to the cloud |
| + | Client owns all intellectual property, including hardware designs |
| - | No in-house mass production; finished devices need a separate contract manufacturer |
| - | Regulatory approvals such as CE, FCC or medical clearances stay the client's job, though Lemberg prepares the technical files |
| - | A 200-person company can run several product teams in parallel but not a 100-engineer programme |
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff sizeable embedded teams quickly |
| + | Public company, so finances are visible |
| + | Polish location suits EU buyers |
| - | Rapid growth means varying maturity between units |
| - | Little in-house electronics design |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard.
Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: an automotive supplier needs an HMI team.
Large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Industrial equipment, Healthcare, Energy.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Spyrosoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Spyrosoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An automotive supplier needs an HMI team. | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| An industrial firm wants Qt interfaces for machines. | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company.
Spyrosoft (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an industrial firm wants Qt interfaces for machines. If your situation matches that, Spyrosoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Spyrosoft FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Spyrosoft?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: can staff sizeable embedded teams quickly.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Spyrosoft differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. Spyrosoft uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Spyrosoft?
Spyrosoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Spyrosoft?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 1,500+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive vs Automotive, Industrial equipment).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.