Lemberg Solutions vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Very (4.2/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected products needing hardware, firmware and cloud. Very is the stronger option for funded US product teams, platform-heavy IoT. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2011 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in London, Hamburg, Kraków) | Bozeman, Montana, United States (distributed) |
| Team size | 200+ | 150–250 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company | US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team | Time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $250,000 |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, RTOS, Embedded Linux | Embedded C, Elixir, Nerves |
| Industries served | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture |
Lemberg Solutions vs Very: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Few IoT vendors can design the circuit board, write the RTOS firmware, program an FPGA and build the cloud back end without subcontracting part of it. Lemberg Solutions does all of that with 200+ engineers, working since 2007 from Lviv and Kraków with client-facing offices in London and Hamburg. Its connectivity and edge AI work is backed by partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics, plus an in-house lab for prototyping and testing. Clients include Bosch Rexroth, Astronics, Caltech, Cellink, Ferno and Speede.
Very
Very was founded in 2011 by Ben Wald and started out building software and websites before settling on IoT. Its staff work remotely across the US, with Bozeman, Montana listed as its base, and Built In counts 193 employees. The company covers hardware prototyping, firmware, IoT platforms and apps. Its Clutch profile lists a $250,000 minimum project size and $200 to $300 hourly rates.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Very
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Very
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Very
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $250,000 |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Time and materials, Team extension |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Very
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics |
| Best use cases | A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard., An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team., An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Time and materials |
Lemberg Solutions vs Very: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help with early silicon access and vendor support |
| + | In-house lab shortens the loop between a prototype failing a test and a fix being tried |
| + | Builds products to the relevant industry standards and protocols, with ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification behind its security and quality processes |
| + | Edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need to decide locally instead of sending everything to the cloud |
| + | Client owns all intellectual property, including hardware designs |
| - | No in-house mass production; finished devices need a separate contract manufacturer |
| - | Regulatory approvals such as CE, FCC or medical clearances stay the client's job, though Lemberg prepares the technical files |
| - | A 200-person company can run several product teams in parallel but not a 100-engineer programme |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | US-based engineers and product managers |
| + | Strong on cloud platforms and data, not just devices |
| + | Experience taking products from prototype to launch |
| - | $250,000 minimum and $200 to $300 hourly rates rule out most small projects |
| - | Less electronics design depth than dedicated hardware houses |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard.
Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: a funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team.
US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Minimum engagement starts at $250,000. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Very ($250,000) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Very
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team. | Limited | Strong | Very |
| An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | Limited | Strong | Very |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Very
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company.
Very (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. If your situation matches that, Very is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Very FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Very?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team. Very's strongest advantage: US-based engineers and product managers.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Very differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. Very uses time and materials pricing with a minimum engagement of $250,000. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Very?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Very?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Very's primary differentiator is: US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 150–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs $250,000), and primary industries served (Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive vs Industrial equipment, Energy).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.