Witekio vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Witekio (4.4/5) edges ahead of Very (4.2/5) overall. Witekio is the better choice for embedded Linux, board support and device updates. Very is the stronger option for funded US product teams, platform-heavy IoT. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Witekio vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Witekio | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2001 | 2011 |
| HQ | France (owned by Avnet, United States) | Bozeman, Montana, United States (distributed) |
| Team size | 150–200 | 150–250 |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Embedded software specialist backed by Avnet's component supply chain | US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $250,000 |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, Yocto, Android | Embedded C, Elixir, Nerves |
| Industries served | Industrial equipment, Healthcare, Consumer electronics, Automotive | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture |
Witekio vs Very: overview
Witekio
Witekio began in 2001 as Adeneo Embedded, a French embedded software firm, and was renamed as it moved toward IoT. Avnet, the US electronics distributor, agreed to buy it in September 2019, when it had about 120 employees in France, the US, the UK and Germany. It now cites more than 180 engineers. Its strengths are embedded Linux, board support packages, connectivity and device update systems.
Very
Very was founded in 2011 by Ben Wald and started out building software and websites before settling on IoT. Its staff work remotely across the US, with Bozeman, Montana listed as its base, and Built In counts 193 employees. The company covers hardware prototyping, firmware, IoT platforms and apps. Its Clutch profile lists a $250,000 minimum project size and $200 to $300 hourly rates.
Services and capabilities: Witekio vs Very
| Capability | Witekio | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Witekio vs Very
| Framework / platform | Witekio | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Witekio vs Very
| Criterion | Witekio | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $250,000 |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Time and materials, Team extension |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Witekio vs Very
| Dimension | Witekio | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial equipment, Healthcare, Consumer electronics | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics |
| Best use cases | A device maker needs a Yocto build and secure over-the-air updates., A company wants an Android or Qt interface on an embedded touchscreen. | A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team., An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Time and materials |
Witekio vs Very: pros and cons
| Witekio | |
|---|---|
| + | Deep board support package and embedded Linux experience |
| + | Avnet ownership gives access to component supply and hardware partners |
| + | Offices in France, the US, the UK and Germany |
| - | Owned by Avnet since 2019, so priorities can lean toward Avnet's component and hardware business |
| - | Does less custom circuit design than full hardware houses |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | US-based engineers and product managers |
| + | Strong on cloud platforms and data, not just devices |
| + | Experience taking products from prototype to launch |
| - | $250,000 minimum and $200 to $300 hourly rates rule out most small projects |
| - | Less electronics design depth than dedicated hardware houses |
Who should choose Witekio?
A typical fit: a device maker needs a Yocto build and secure over-the-air updates.
Embedded software specialist backed by Avnet's component supply chain. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Healthcare, Consumer electronics, Automotive.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: a funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team.
US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Minimum engagement starts at $250,000. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture.
Decision matrix: Witekio vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Witekio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Witekio (Not published) vs Very ($250,000) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Witekio |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Very |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Very |
Use case fit: Witekio vs Very
| Use case | Witekio fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A device maker needs a Yocto build and secure over-the-air updates. | Strong | Limited | Witekio |
| A company wants an Android or Qt interface on an embedded touchscreen. | Strong | Limited | Witekio |
| A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team. | Limited | Strong | Very |
| An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | Limited | Strong | Very |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Limited | Strong | Very |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Witekio |
Verdict: Witekio vs Very
Witekio (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Embedded software specialist backed by Avnet's component supply chain.
Very (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. If your situation matches that, Very is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Witekio vs Very FAQ
Is Witekio better than Very?
Witekio (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Witekio's strongest advantage: deep board support package and embedded Linux experience. Very's strongest advantage: US-based engineers and product managers.
How do Witekio and Very differ in pricing?
Witekio uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Very uses time and materials pricing with a minimum engagement of $250,000. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Witekio or Very?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Witekio and Very?
Witekio's primary differentiator is: embedded software specialist backed by Avnet's component supply chain. Very's primary differentiator is: US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. They also differ in team size (150–200 vs 150–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs $250,000), and primary industries served (Industrial equipment, Healthcare vs Industrial equipment, Energy).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.