Very vs Sigma Software: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Very (4.2/5) edges ahead of Sigma Software (4.0/5) overall. Very is the better choice for funded US product teams, platform-heavy IoT. Sigma Software is the stronger option for embedded and cloud teams under Swedish ownership. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Very vs Sigma Software: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Very | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2002 |
| HQ | Bozeman, Montana, United States (distributed) | Stockholm, Sweden and Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 150–250 | 2,000+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering | Scandinavian governance with Ukrainian and Polish embedded engineers |
| Pricing model | Time and materials | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | $250,000 | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C, Elixir, Nerves | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, AWS IoT |
| Industries served | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture | Automotive, Telecoms, Healthcare, Energy |
Very vs Sigma Software: overview
Very
Very was founded in 2011 by Ben Wald and started out building software and websites before settling on IoT. Its staff work remotely across the US, with Bozeman, Montana listed as its base, and Built In counts 193 employees. The company covers hardware prototyping, firmware, IoT platforms and apps. Its Clutch profile lists a $250,000 minimum project size and $200 to $300 hourly rates.
Sigma Software
Sigma Software was founded in 2002 and is part of the Swedish Sigma group. It describes a team of over 2,100 professionals in offices across 19 countries. Embedded and automotive software are among its practices, alongside a wide range of web, cloud and enterprise work. IoT buyers will find capable firmware and cloud engineers, but not a hardware design house.
Services and capabilities: Very vs Sigma Software
| Capability | Very | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Very vs Sigma Software
| Framework / platform | Very | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | ✓ |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Very vs Sigma Software
| Criterion | Very | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $250,000 | Not published |
| Engagement models | Time and materials, Team extension | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Very vs Sigma Software
| Dimension | Very | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics | Automotive, Telecoms, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team., An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | A telecoms company needs embedded network software., An automotive supplier wants firmware developers. |
| Typical project type | Time and materials | Dedicated team |
Very vs Sigma Software: pros and cons
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | US-based engineers and product managers |
| + | Strong on cloud platforms and data, not just devices |
| + | Experience taking products from prototype to launch |
| - | $250,000 minimum and $200 to $300 hourly rates rule out most small projects |
| - | Less electronics design depth than dedicated hardware houses |
| Sigma Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Swedish parent adds governance |
| + | Broad coverage of firmware, cloud and apps |
| + | Competitive rates |
| - | IoT is not its main focus |
| - | No electronics design |
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: a funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team.
US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Minimum engagement starts at $250,000. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture.
Who should choose Sigma Software?
A typical fit: a telecoms company needs embedded network software.
Scandinavian governance with Ukrainian and Polish embedded engineers. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Telecoms, Healthcare, Energy.
Decision matrix: Very vs Sigma Software
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Sigma Software |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sigma Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Very ($250,000) vs Sigma Software (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Very |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Very |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Very |
Use case fit: Very vs Sigma Software
| Use case | Very fit | Sigma Software fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team. | Strong | Limited | Very |
| An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | Strong | Limited | Very |
| A telecoms company needs embedded network software. | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
| An automotive supplier wants firmware developers. | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Limited | Very |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
Verdict: Very vs Sigma Software
Very (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering.
Sigma Software (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an automotive supplier wants firmware developers. If your situation matches that, Sigma Software is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Very vs Sigma Software FAQ
Is Very better than Sigma Software?
Very (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Very's strongest advantage: US-based engineers and product managers. Sigma Software's strongest advantage: swedish parent adds governance.
How do Very and Sigma Software differ in pricing?
Very uses time and materials pricing with a minimum engagement of $250,000. Sigma Software uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Very or Sigma Software?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Very and Sigma Software?
Very's primary differentiator is: US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Sigma Software's primary differentiator is: scandinavian governance with Ukrainian and Polish embedded engineers. They also differ in team size (150–250 vs 2,000+), minimum engagement ($250,000 vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial equipment, Energy vs Automotive, Telecoms).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.