Very vs Jaycon: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Very (4.2/5) edges ahead of Jaycon (4.1/5) overall. Very is the better choice for funded US product teams, platform-heavy IoT. Jaycon is the stronger option for design plus manufacturing from one vendor. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Very vs Jaycon: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Very | Jaycon |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2011 |
| HQ | Bozeman, Montana, United States (distributed) | Palm Bay, Florida, United States |
| Team size | 150–250 | 10–49 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering | Takes a device from industrial design to production runs, including enclosures |
| Pricing model | Time and materials | Fixed price, per-unit manufacturing pricing |
| Min. engagement | $250,000 | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C, Elixir, Nerves | PCB design, Embedded C, nRF52 |
| Industries served | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Smart home |
Very vs Jaycon: overview
Very
Very was founded in 2011 by Ben Wald and started out building software and websites before settling on IoT. Its staff work remotely across the US, with Bozeman, Montana listed as its base, and Built In counts 193 employees. The company covers hardware prototyping, firmware, IoT platforms and apps. Its Clutch profile lists a $250,000 minimum project size and $200 to $300 hourly rates.
Jaycon
Jaycon was founded in 2011 and is based in Central Florida. It designs, prototypes and manufactures wireless and IoT hardware, with in-house injection moulding and circuit board assembly plus production capacity in China and Vietnam. The team is 10 to 49 people according to directories, it holds ISO 9001:2015 certification, and it made the 2025 Inc. 5000 list. It is a design partner of both Nordic Semiconductor and Silicon Labs.
Services and capabilities: Very vs Jaycon
| Capability | Very | Jaycon |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✗ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Very vs Jaycon
| Framework / platform | Very | Jaycon |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Very vs Jaycon
| Criterion | Very | Jaycon |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $250,000 | Not published |
| Engagement models | Time and materials, Team extension | Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Very vs Jaycon
| Dimension | Very | Jaycon |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team., An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | A start-up needs a wearable designed and manufactured., A brand wants a wireless sensor with an enclosure and a first production run. |
| Typical project type | Time and materials | Fixed project |
Very vs Jaycon: pros and cons
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | US-based engineers and product managers |
| + | Strong on cloud platforms and data, not just devices |
| + | Experience taking products from prototype to launch |
| - | $250,000 minimum and $200 to $300 hourly rates rule out most small projects |
| - | Less electronics design depth than dedicated hardware houses |
| Jaycon | |
|---|---|
| + | Handles manufacturing in-house, which most IoT software firms do not |
| + | Industrial and mechanical design as well as electronics |
| + | Nordic and Silicon Labs partner status |
| - | Small engineering team |
| - | Cloud platform and app work are limited |
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: a funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team.
US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Minimum engagement starts at $250,000. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture.
Who should choose Jaycon?
A typical fit: a start-up needs a wearable designed and manufactured.
Takes a device from industrial design to production runs, including enclosures. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Smart home.
Decision matrix: Very vs Jaycon
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Jaycon |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Very ($250,000) vs Jaycon (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Very |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Very |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Very |
Use case fit: Very vs Jaycon
| Use case | Very fit | Jaycon fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team. | Strong | Limited | Very |
| An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | Strong | Limited | Very |
| A start-up needs a wearable designed and manufactured. | Limited | Strong | Jaycon |
| A brand wants a wireless sensor with an enclosure and a first production run. | Limited | Strong | Jaycon |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | Jaycon |
Verdict: Very vs Jaycon
Very (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering.
Jaycon (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a brand wants a wireless sensor with an enclosure and a first production run. If your situation matches that, Jaycon is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Very vs Jaycon FAQ
Is Very better than Jaycon?
Very (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Very's strongest advantage: US-based engineers and product managers. Jaycon's strongest advantage: handles manufacturing in-house, which most IoT software firms do not.
How do Very and Jaycon differ in pricing?
Very uses time and materials pricing with a minimum engagement of $250,000. Jaycon uses fixed price, per-unit manufacturing pricing pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Very or Jaycon?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Very and Jaycon?
Very's primary differentiator is: US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Jaycon's primary differentiator is: takes a device from industrial design to production runs, including enclosures. They also differ in team size (150–250 vs 10–49), minimum engagement ($250,000 vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial equipment, Energy vs Consumer electronics, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.