Very vs Intellias: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Very (4.2/5) edges ahead of Intellias (4.0/5) overall. Very is the better choice for funded US product teams, platform-heavy IoT. Intellias is the stronger option for connected vehicles, navigation and infotainment. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Very vs Intellias: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Very | Intellias |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2002 |
| HQ | Bozeman, Montana, United States (distributed) | Lviv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 150–250 | 3,000+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering | Automotive connectivity work recognised by Frost & Sullivan and BlackBerry |
| Pricing model | Time and materials | Dedicated team, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | $250,000 | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C, Elixir, Nerves | Embedded C++, Android Automotive, Navigation |
| Industries served | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture | Automotive, Logistics, Telecoms, Retail |
Very vs Intellias: overview
Very
Very was founded in 2011 by Ben Wald and started out building software and websites before settling on IoT. Its staff work remotely across the US, with Bozeman, Montana listed as its base, and Built In counts 193 employees. The company covers hardware prototyping, firmware, IoT platforms and apps. Its Clutch profile lists a $250,000 minimum project size and $200 to $300 hourly rates.
Intellias
Intellias was founded in Lviv in 2002 and grew from about 150 people in 2013 to more than 1,100 by 2018, when Horizon Capital took a minority stake. Recent estimates put it at around 3,000 or more. Its best-known IoT work is in connected vehicles, navigation and infotainment, and in 2024 it partnered with BlackBerry on the IVY vehicle data platform. It also won a 2023 Frost & Sullivan award for connected infotainment software.
Services and capabilities: Very vs Intellias
| Capability | Very | Intellias |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Very vs Intellias
| Framework / platform | Very | Intellias |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Very vs Intellias
| Criterion | Very | Intellias |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $250,000 | Not published |
| Engagement models | Time and materials, Team extension | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Very vs Intellias
| Dimension | Very | Intellias |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics | Automotive, Logistics, Telecoms |
| Best use cases | A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team., An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | An automaker needs connected infotainment software., A mobility company wants a vehicle data platform. |
| Typical project type | Time and materials | Dedicated team |
Very vs Intellias: pros and cons
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | US-based engineers and product managers |
| + | Strong on cloud platforms and data, not just devices |
| + | Experience taking products from prototype to launch |
| - | $250,000 minimum and $200 to $300 hourly rates rule out most small projects |
| - | Less electronics design depth than dedicated hardware houses |
| Intellias | |
|---|---|
| + | Strong in connected car and location software |
| + | Large teams available |
| + | Horizon Capital backing |
| - | Outside automotive, its IoT offering is less distinctive |
| - | No hardware design |
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: a funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team.
US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Minimum engagement starts at $250,000. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture.
Who should choose Intellias?
A typical fit: an automaker needs connected infotainment software.
Automotive connectivity work recognised by Frost & Sullivan and BlackBerry. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Logistics, Telecoms, Retail.
Decision matrix: Very vs Intellias
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Intellias |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Very ($250,000) vs Intellias (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Very |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Very |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Very |
Use case fit: Very vs Intellias
| Use case | Very fit | Intellias fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team. | Strong | Limited | Very |
| An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | Strong | Limited | Very |
| An automaker needs connected infotainment software. | Limited | Strong | Intellias |
| A mobility company wants a vehicle data platform. | Limited | Strong | Intellias |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Limited | Very |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Very vs Intellias
Very (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering.
Intellias (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a mobility company wants a vehicle data platform. If your situation matches that, Intellias is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Very vs Intellias FAQ
Is Very better than Intellias?
Very (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Very's strongest advantage: US-based engineers and product managers. Intellias's strongest advantage: strong in connected car and location software.
How do Very and Intellias differ in pricing?
Very uses time and materials pricing with a minimum engagement of $250,000. Intellias uses dedicated team, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Very or Intellias?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Very and Intellias?
Very's primary differentiator is: US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Intellias's primary differentiator is: automotive connectivity work recognised by Frost & Sullivan and BlackBerry. They also differ in team size (150–250 vs 3,000+), minimum engagement ($250,000 vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial equipment, Energy vs Automotive, Logistics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.