Very vs Embitel Technologies: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Very (4.2/5) edges ahead of Embitel Technologies (4.1/5) overall. Very is the better choice for funded US product teams, platform-heavy IoT. Embitel Technologies is the stronger option for automotive and connected-vehicle IoT. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Very vs Embitel Technologies: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Very | Embitel Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2006 |
| HQ | Bozeman, Montana, United States (distributed) | Bengaluru, India (Volkswagen Group) |
| Team size | 150–250 | 600–1,200 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering | Automotive embedded engineering backed by Volkswagen Group ownership |
| Pricing model | Time and materials | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $250,000 | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C, Elixir, Nerves | AUTOSAR, Embedded C, CAN |
| Industries served | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture | Automotive, Industrial equipment, Retail |
Very vs Embitel Technologies: overview
Very
Very was founded in 2011 by Ben Wald and started out building software and websites before settling on IoT. Its staff work remotely across the US, with Bozeman, Montana listed as its base, and Built In counts 193 employees. The company covers hardware prototyping, firmware, IoT platforms and apps. Its Clutch profile lists a $250,000 minimum project size and $200 to $300 hourly rates.
Embitel Technologies
Embitel began in 2006 in a Bengaluru apartment and is now a Volkswagen Group company headquartered in Whitefield, with development centres in Ahmedabad, Pune and Coimbatore. Its focus areas are automotive embedded software, IoT for connected vehicles and industrial automation, and digital commerce. It works with CARIAD, Volkswagen's software unit. Headcount estimates range from roughly 600 to over 1,000.
Services and capabilities: Very vs Embitel Technologies
| Capability | Very | Embitel Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✗ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Very vs Embitel Technologies
| Framework / platform | Very | Embitel Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Very vs Embitel Technologies
| Criterion | Very | Embitel Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $250,000 | Not published |
| Engagement models | Time and materials, Team extension | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Very vs Embitel Technologies
| Dimension | Very | Embitel Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics | Automotive, Industrial equipment, Retail |
| Best use cases | A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team., An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | A tier 1 supplier needs AUTOSAR software., A fleet operator wants a telematics platform. |
| Typical project type | Time and materials | Dedicated team |
Very vs Embitel Technologies: pros and cons
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | US-based engineers and product managers |
| + | Strong on cloud platforms and data, not just devices |
| + | Experience taking products from prototype to launch |
| - | $250,000 minimum and $200 to $300 hourly rates rule out most small projects |
| - | Less electronics design depth than dedicated hardware houses |
| Embitel Technologies | |
|---|---|
| + | Deep automotive experience, including work for Volkswagen's software unit |
| + | Indian delivery keeps costs low |
| + | Covers both vehicle electronics and cloud |
| - | Volkswagen Group ownership may concern rival automakers |
| - | Outside automotive its IoT work is less distinctive |
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: a funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team.
US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Minimum engagement starts at $250,000. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture.
Who should choose Embitel Technologies?
A typical fit: a tier 1 supplier needs AUTOSAR software.
Automotive embedded engineering backed by Volkswagen Group ownership. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Industrial equipment, Retail.
Decision matrix: Very vs Embitel Technologies
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Embitel Technologies |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Embitel Technologies |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Very ($250,000) vs Embitel Technologies (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Very |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Very |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Very |
Use case fit: Very vs Embitel Technologies
| Use case | Very fit | Embitel Technologies fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team. | Strong | Limited | Very |
| An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | Strong | Limited | Very |
| A tier 1 supplier needs AUTOSAR software. | Limited | Strong | Embitel Technologies |
| A fleet operator wants a telematics platform. | Limited | Strong | Embitel Technologies |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | Embitel Technologies |
Verdict: Very vs Embitel Technologies
Very (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering.
Embitel Technologies (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a fleet operator wants a telematics platform. If your situation matches that, Embitel Technologies is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Very vs Embitel Technologies FAQ
Is Very better than Embitel Technologies?
Very (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Very's strongest advantage: US-based engineers and product managers. Embitel Technologies's strongest advantage: deep automotive experience, including work for Volkswagen's software unit.
How do Very and Embitel Technologies differ in pricing?
Very uses time and materials pricing with a minimum engagement of $250,000. Embitel Technologies uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Very or Embitel Technologies?
Embitel Technologies is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Very and Embitel Technologies?
Very's primary differentiator is: US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Embitel Technologies's primary differentiator is: automotive embedded engineering backed by Volkswagen Group ownership. They also differ in team size (150–250 vs 600–1,200), minimum engagement ($250,000 vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial equipment, Energy vs Automotive, Industrial equipment).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.