Sirin Software vs MobiDev: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Sirin Software (4.2/5) edges ahead of MobiDev (3.9/5) overall. Sirin Software is the better choice for firmware and IoT apps at Ukrainian rates. MobiDev is the stronger option for IoT apps with AI or AR features. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sirin Software vs MobiDev: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sirin Software | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2009 |
| HQ | Florida, United States (R&D in Kyiv, Ukraine) | Norcross, Georgia, United States |
| Team size | 50–200 | 250–450 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team | Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, BLE | Python, Computer vision, AWS IoT |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics |
Sirin Software vs MobiDev: overview
Sirin Software
Sirin Software was founded in March 2014 and has its R&D centre in Kyiv, with the company registered in Florida. A 2016 merger with Lampa Studio added mobile and web development. Directories now put the team at 50 to 200 people. Embedded systems, IoT and server-side software are its core business.
MobiDev
MobiDev was founded in 2009, opened a US office in Atlanta in 2011, and now lists its headquarters in the Atlanta area. Its engineering centres are in Chernivtsi, Ukraine, and Łódź, Poland. The team was 436 people in late 2022, and recent estimates are closer to 290. IoT is one of several practices next to web, mobile, AI and augmented reality.
Services and capabilities: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
| Capability | Sirin Software | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
| Framework / platform | Sirin Software | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
| Criterion | Sirin Software | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
| Dimension | Sirin Software | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app., A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring., A factory needs computer vision quality checks. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Sirin Software vs MobiDev: pros and cons
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Good balance of firmware and app development |
| + | US entity for contracting |
| + | Lower rates than Western European IoT firms |
| - | Delivery is concentrated in Kyiv, so continuity plans need checking |
| - | Limited circuit design capability |
| MobiDev | |
|---|---|
| + | AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT |
| + | US contracting entity |
| + | Cost-effective Ukrainian and Polish teams |
| - | Headcount appears to have fallen since 2022 |
| - | Little firmware or hardware depth |
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: a smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app.
US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose MobiDev?
A typical fit: a retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring.
Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics.
Decision matrix: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sirin Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sirin Software (Not published) vs MobiDev (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sirin Software |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Neither; consider a hardware design house |
Use case fit: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
| Use case | Sirin Software fit | MobiDev fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring. | Limited | Strong | MobiDev |
| A factory needs computer vision quality checks. | Limited | Strong | MobiDev |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Sirin Software vs MobiDev
Sirin Software (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team.
MobiDev (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a factory needs computer vision quality checks. If your situation matches that, MobiDev is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sirin Software vs MobiDev FAQ
Is Sirin Software better than MobiDev?
Sirin Software (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: good balance of firmware and app development. MobiDev's strongest advantage: AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT.
How do Sirin Software and MobiDev differ in pricing?
Sirin Software uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. MobiDev uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sirin Software or MobiDev?
MobiDev is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sirin Software and MobiDev?
Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. MobiDev's primary differentiator is: combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. They also differ in team size (50–200 vs 250–450), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Healthcare vs Retail, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.