Promwad vs Sirin Software: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Promwad (4.5/5) edges ahead of Sirin Software (4.2/5) overall. Promwad is the better choice for mass-produced electronics, Linux and FPGA designs. Sirin Software is the stronger option for firmware and IoT apps at Ukrainian rates. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Promwad vs Sirin Software: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Promwad | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 | 2014 |
| HQ | Vilnius, Lithuania and Essen, Germany | Florida, United States (R&D in Kyiv, Ukraine) |
| Team size | 100–150 | 50–200 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five EU countries | US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team |
| Pricing model | Fixed price, time and materials | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, Yocto, FPGA | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, BLE |
| Industries served | Telecoms, Automotive, Industrial equipment, Consumer electronics, Energy | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment |
Promwad vs Sirin Software: overview
Promwad
Roman Pakholkov started Promwad in Minsk in 2004 to design mass-produced electronics on systems-on-chip and Linux, and the company later moved its business into the EU. Its Vilnius office, opened in 2016, became a headquarters, and a German entity in Essen now serves the DACH region. Promwad reports 100+ engineers, 500+ projects, and more than 3 million devices produced by its clients. Telecoms, automotive and FPGA work are its strongest areas.
Sirin Software
Sirin Software was founded in March 2014 and has its R&D centre in Kyiv, with the company registered in Florida. A 2016 merger with Lampa Studio added mobile and web development. Directories now put the team at 50 to 200 people. Embedded systems, IoT and server-side software are its core business.
Services and capabilities: Promwad vs Sirin Software
| Capability | Promwad | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Promwad vs Sirin Software
| Framework / platform | Promwad | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Promwad vs Sirin Software
| Criterion | Promwad | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Promwad vs Sirin Software
| Dimension | Promwad | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Telecoms, Automotive, Industrial equipment | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home |
| Best use cases | A telecoms equipment maker needs a Linux-based gateway designed for volume production., An automotive supplier needs FPGA and camera-processing work. | A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app., A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Promwad vs Sirin Software: pros and cons
| Promwad | |
|---|---|
| + | Designs with mass production in mind, including manufacturing support |
| + | Strong embedded Linux and FPGA skills for complex devices |
| + | EU entities in Lithuania and Germany simplify contracting for European buyers |
| - | Belarusian origins may need explaining to some procurement teams, though operations have moved to the EU |
| - | Cloud and app development are thinner than its hardware and firmware work |
| - | Small team limits parallel projects |
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Good balance of firmware and app development |
| + | US entity for contracting |
| + | Lower rates than Western European IoT firms |
| - | Delivery is concentrated in Kyiv, so continuity plans need checking |
| - | Limited circuit design capability |
Who should choose Promwad?
A typical fit: a telecoms equipment maker needs a Linux-based gateway designed for volume production.
Two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five EU countries. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Telecoms, Automotive, Industrial equipment, Consumer electronics, Energy.
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: a smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app.
US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment.
Decision matrix: Promwad vs Sirin Software
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Promwad |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sirin Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Promwad (Not published) vs Sirin Software (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Promwad |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Promwad |
Use case fit: Promwad vs Sirin Software
| Use case | Promwad fit | Sirin Software fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A telecoms equipment maker needs a Linux-based gateway designed for volume production. | Strong | Limited | Promwad |
| An automotive supplier needs FPGA and camera-processing work. | Strong | Limited | Promwad |
| A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app. | Limited | Strong | Sirin Software |
| A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | Limited | Strong | Sirin Software |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Limited | Promwad |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Promwad |
Verdict: Promwad vs Sirin Software
Promwad (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five EU countries.
Sirin Software (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. If your situation matches that, Sirin Software is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Promwad vs Sirin Software FAQ
Is Promwad better than Sirin Software?
Promwad (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Promwad's strongest advantage: designs with mass production in mind, including manufacturing support. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: good balance of firmware and app development.
How do Promwad and Sirin Software differ in pricing?
Promwad uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Sirin Software uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Promwad or Sirin Software?
Promwad is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Promwad and Sirin Software?
Promwad's primary differentiator is: two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five EU countries. Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. They also differ in team size (100–150 vs 50–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Telecoms, Automotive vs Consumer electronics, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.