MobiDev vs ScienceSoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
MobiDev (3.9/5) edges ahead of ScienceSoft (3.9/5) overall. MobiDev is the better choice for IoT apps with AI or AR features. ScienceSoft is the stronger option for IoT dashboards and business-system integration. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
MobiDev vs ScienceSoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | MobiDev | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 1989 |
| HQ | Norcross, Georgia, United States | McKinney, Texas, United States |
| Team size | 250–450 | 700–800 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills | Long software consulting history applied to IoT monitoring platforms |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, Computer vision, AWS IoT | Azure IoT, AWS IoT, .NET |
| Industries served | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics | Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Retail, Logistics |
MobiDev vs ScienceSoft: overview
MobiDev
MobiDev was founded in 2009, opened a US office in Atlanta in 2011, and now lists its headquarters in the Atlanta area. Its engineering centres are in Chernivtsi, Ukraine, and Łódź, Poland. The team was 436 people in late 2022, and recent estimates are closer to 290. IoT is one of several practices next to web, mobile, AI and augmented reality.
ScienceSoft
ScienceSoft has been in business since 1989, is headquartered in McKinney, Texas, and cites more than 750 experts across the US, the Gulf region and the EU. It has worked on IoT since 2011, mostly the software side: monitoring platforms, dashboards and integration with business systems. Clutch lists an IoT physiotherapy platform among its projects. Hardware and firmware are not where it is strongest.
Services and capabilities: MobiDev vs ScienceSoft
| Capability | MobiDev | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✗ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: MobiDev vs ScienceSoft
| Framework / platform | MobiDev | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: MobiDev vs ScienceSoft
| Criterion | MobiDev | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: MobiDev vs ScienceSoft
| Dimension | MobiDev | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment | Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Retail |
| Best use cases | A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring., A factory needs computer vision quality checks. | A manufacturer wants equipment monitoring linked to its ERP., A healthcare provider needs a remote patient monitoring portal. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
MobiDev vs ScienceSoft: pros and cons
| MobiDev | |
|---|---|
| + | AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT |
| + | US contracting entity |
| + | Cost-effective Ukrainian and Polish teams |
| - | Headcount appears to have fallen since 2022 |
| - | Little firmware or hardware depth |
| ScienceSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Decades of software delivery |
| + | Good at linking IoT data to ERP and other business systems |
| + | Fixed-price options |
| - | No hardware or firmware focus |
| - | Headcount figures vary between sources |
Who should choose MobiDev?
A typical fit: a retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring.
Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics.
Who should choose ScienceSoft?
A typical fit: a manufacturer wants equipment monitoring linked to its ERP.
Long software consulting history applied to IoT monitoring platforms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Retail, Logistics.
Decision matrix: MobiDev vs ScienceSoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | ScienceSoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | MobiDev |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: MobiDev (Not published) vs ScienceSoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | MobiDev |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Neither; consider a hardware design house |
Use case fit: MobiDev vs ScienceSoft
| Use case | MobiDev fit | ScienceSoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring. | Strong | Limited | MobiDev |
| A factory needs computer vision quality checks. | Strong | Limited | MobiDev |
| A manufacturer wants equipment monitoring linked to its ERP. | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| A healthcare provider needs a remote patient monitoring portal. | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
Verdict: MobiDev vs ScienceSoft
MobiDev (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills.
ScienceSoft (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a healthcare provider needs a remote patient monitoring portal. If your situation matches that, ScienceSoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
MobiDev vs ScienceSoft FAQ
Is MobiDev better than ScienceSoft?
MobiDev (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. MobiDev's strongest advantage: AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT. ScienceSoft's strongest advantage: decades of software delivery.
How do MobiDev and ScienceSoft differ in pricing?
MobiDev uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. ScienceSoft uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: MobiDev or ScienceSoft?
ScienceSoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between MobiDev and ScienceSoft?
MobiDev's primary differentiator is: combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. ScienceSoft's primary differentiator is: long software consulting history applied to IoT monitoring platforms. They also differ in team size (250–450 vs 700–800), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Retail, Healthcare vs Healthcare, Industrial equipment).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.