Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of ScienceSoft (3.9/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected products needing hardware, firmware and cloud. ScienceSoft is the stronger option for IoT dashboards and business-system integration. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1989 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in London, Hamburg, Kraków) | McKinney, Texas, United States |
| Team size | 200+ | 700–800 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company | Long software consulting history applied to IoT monitoring platforms |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, RTOS, Embedded Linux | Azure IoT, AWS IoT, .NET |
| Industries served | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment | Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Retail, Logistics |
Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Few IoT vendors can design the circuit board, write the RTOS firmware, program an FPGA and build the cloud back end without subcontracting part of it. Lemberg Solutions does all of that with 200+ engineers, working since 2007 from Lviv and Kraków with client-facing offices in London and Hamburg. Its connectivity and edge AI work is backed by partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics, plus an in-house lab for prototyping and testing. Clients include Bosch Rexroth, Astronics, Caltech, Cellink, Ferno and Speede.
ScienceSoft
ScienceSoft has been in business since 1989, is headquartered in McKinney, Texas, and cites more than 750 experts across the US, the Gulf region and the EU. It has worked on IoT since 2011, mostly the software side: monitoring platforms, dashboards and integration with business systems. Clutch lists an IoT physiotherapy platform among its projects. Hardware and firmware are not where it is strongest.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✗ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy | Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Retail |
| Best use cases | A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard., An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | A manufacturer wants equipment monitoring linked to its ERP., A healthcare provider needs a remote patient monitoring portal. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help with early silicon access and vendor support |
| + | In-house lab shortens the loop between a prototype failing a test and a fix being tried |
| + | Builds products to the relevant industry standards and protocols, with ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification behind its security and quality processes |
| + | Edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need to decide locally instead of sending everything to the cloud |
| + | Client owns all intellectual property, including hardware designs |
| - | No in-house mass production; finished devices need a separate contract manufacturer |
| - | Regulatory approvals such as CE, FCC or medical clearances stay the client's job, though Lemberg prepares the technical files |
| - | A 200-person company can run several product teams in parallel but not a 100-engineer programme |
| ScienceSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Decades of software delivery |
| + | Good at linking IoT data to ERP and other business systems |
| + | Fixed-price options |
| - | No hardware or firmware focus |
| - | Headcount figures vary between sources |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard.
Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose ScienceSoft?
A typical fit: a manufacturer wants equipment monitoring linked to its ERP.
Long software consulting history applied to IoT monitoring platforms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Retail, Logistics.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs ScienceSoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | ScienceSoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| A manufacturer wants equipment monitoring linked to its ERP. | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| A healthcare provider needs a remote patient monitoring portal. | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company.
ScienceSoft (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a healthcare provider needs a remote patient monitoring portal. If your situation matches that, ScienceSoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than ScienceSoft?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team. ScienceSoft's strongest advantage: decades of software delivery.
How do Lemberg Solutions and ScienceSoft differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. ScienceSoft uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or ScienceSoft?
ScienceSoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and ScienceSoft?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. ScienceSoft's primary differentiator is: long software consulting history applied to IoT monitoring platforms. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 700–800), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive vs Healthcare, Industrial equipment).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.