Integra Sources vs Cyient: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Integra Sources (4.2/5) edges ahead of Cyient (3.8/5) overall. Integra Sources is the better choice for budget hardware and firmware for start-ups. Cyient is the stronger option for engineering outsourcing for aerospace and rail OEMs. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Integra Sources vs Cyient: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Integra Sources | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 1991 |
| HQ | Astana, Kazakhstan | Hyderabad, India |
| Team size | 30–60 | 10,000+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list | Broad engineering services with embedded work for heavy-industry clients |
| Pricing model | Fixed price, time and materials | Time and materials, managed service |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | PCB design, Embedded C, STM32 | Embedded C, Industrial protocols, Azure IoT |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home | Aerospace, Rail and transport, Energy, Telecoms, Healthcare |
Integra Sources vs Cyient: overview
Integra Sources
Two hardware and software engineers founded Integra Sources in 2014, and it is based in Astana, Kazakhstan. The team is small, cited at 30 to 50+ people, and it designs electronics, writes firmware and builds IoT and embedded systems. Portfolio projects include an asset tracker, a robotic lawnmower and a pet camera. It reports more than 250 completed projects.
Cyient
Cyient was incorporated in 1991 and is headquartered in Hyderabad. It reported 12,049 employees at the end of March 2026 and works for more than 300 customers on mechanical, electrical, embedded, network and plant engineering. Embedded systems and Industry 4.0 connectivity are among its services. For a buyer focused purely on IoT products, they are a small part of a much larger engineering business.
Services and capabilities: Integra Sources vs Cyient
| Capability | Integra Sources | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Integra Sources vs Cyient
| Framework / platform | Integra Sources | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| Azure IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Integra Sources vs Cyient
| Criterion | Integra Sources | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Managed service |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Integra Sources vs Cyient
| Dimension | Integra Sources | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Enterprise |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment | Aerospace, Rail and transport, Energy |
| Best use cases | A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype., A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. | A rail OEM needs embedded engineering support., A utility wants network engineering and monitoring. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Integra Sources vs Cyient: pros and cons
| Integra Sources | |
|---|---|
| + | Low rates for both hardware and firmware |
| + | Hands-on prototype experience across many consumer devices |
| + | Accepts small fixed-price projects |
| - | Very small team |
| - | Kazakhstan location is unfamiliar to many procurement teams |
| - | Thin cloud platform capability |
| Cyient | |
|---|---|
| + | Long relationships with aerospace and rail OEMs |
| + | Low-cost engineering capacity |
| + | Plant and network engineering alongside devices |
| - | IoT is a minor service line |
| - | Headcount has declined over the past two years |
Who should choose Integra Sources?
A typical fit: a start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype.
Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home.
Who should choose Cyient?
A typical fit: a rail OEM needs embedded engineering support.
Broad engineering services with embedded work for heavy-industry clients. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Aerospace, Rail and transport, Energy, Telecoms, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Integra Sources vs Cyient
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Integra Sources |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Cyient |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Integra Sources (Not published) vs Cyient (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Cyient |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Integra Sources |
Use case fit: Integra Sources vs Cyient
| Use case | Integra Sources fit | Cyient fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype. | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
| A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
| A rail OEM needs embedded engineering support. | Limited | Strong | Cyient |
| A utility wants network engineering and monitoring. | Limited | Strong | Cyient |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
Verdict: Integra Sources vs Cyient
Integra Sources (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list.
Cyient (3.8/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a utility wants network engineering and monitoring. If your situation matches that, Cyient is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Integra Sources vs Cyient FAQ
Is Integra Sources better than Cyient?
Integra Sources (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Integra Sources's strongest advantage: low rates for both hardware and firmware. Cyient's strongest advantage: long relationships with aerospace and rail OEMs.
How do Integra Sources and Cyient differ in pricing?
Integra Sources uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Cyient uses time and materials, managed service pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Integra Sources or Cyient?
Cyient is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Integra Sources and Cyient?
Integra Sources's primary differentiator is: electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. Cyient's primary differentiator is: broad engineering services with embedded work for heavy-industry clients. They also differ in team size (30–60 vs 10,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Logistics vs Aerospace, Rail and transport).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.