Lemberg Solutions vs Cyient: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Cyient (3.8/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected products needing hardware, firmware and cloud. Cyient is the stronger option for engineering outsourcing for aerospace and rail OEMs. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Cyient: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1991 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in London, Hamburg, Kraków) | Hyderabad, India |
| Team size | 200+ | 10,000+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company | Broad engineering services with embedded work for heavy-industry clients |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team | Time and materials, managed service |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, RTOS, Embedded Linux | Embedded C, Industrial protocols, Azure IoT |
| Industries served | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment | Aerospace, Rail and transport, Energy, Telecoms, Healthcare |
Lemberg Solutions vs Cyient: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Few IoT vendors can design the circuit board, write the RTOS firmware, program an FPGA and build the cloud back end without subcontracting part of it. Lemberg Solutions does all of that with 200+ engineers, working since 2007 from Lviv and Kraków with client-facing offices in London and Hamburg. Its connectivity and edge AI work is backed by partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics, plus an in-house lab for prototyping and testing. Clients include Bosch Rexroth, Astronics, Caltech, Cellink, Ferno and Speede.
Cyient
Cyient was incorporated in 1991 and is headquartered in Hyderabad. It reported 12,049 employees at the end of March 2026 and works for more than 300 customers on mechanical, electrical, embedded, network and plant engineering. Embedded systems and Industry 4.0 connectivity are among its services. For a buyer focused purely on IoT products, they are a small part of a much larger engineering business.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Cyient
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Cyient
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Cyient
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Managed service |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Cyient
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Cyient |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Enterprise |
| Best industries | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy | Aerospace, Rail and transport, Energy |
| Best use cases | A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard., An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | A rail OEM needs embedded engineering support., A utility wants network engineering and monitoring. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs Cyient: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help with early silicon access and vendor support |
| + | In-house lab shortens the loop between a prototype failing a test and a fix being tried |
| + | Builds products to the relevant industry standards and protocols, with ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification behind its security and quality processes |
| + | Edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need to decide locally instead of sending everything to the cloud |
| + | Client owns all intellectual property, including hardware designs |
| - | No in-house mass production; finished devices need a separate contract manufacturer |
| - | Regulatory approvals such as CE, FCC or medical clearances stay the client's job, though Lemberg prepares the technical files |
| - | A 200-person company can run several product teams in parallel but not a 100-engineer programme |
| Cyient | |
|---|---|
| + | Long relationships with aerospace and rail OEMs |
| + | Low-cost engineering capacity |
| + | Plant and network engineering alongside devices |
| - | IoT is a minor service line |
| - | Headcount has declined over the past two years |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard.
Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose Cyient?
A typical fit: a rail OEM needs embedded engineering support.
Broad engineering services with embedded work for heavy-industry clients. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Aerospace, Rail and transport, Energy, Telecoms, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Cyient
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Cyient (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Cyient
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Cyient fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| A rail OEM needs embedded engineering support. | Limited | Strong | Cyient |
| A utility wants network engineering and monitoring. | Limited | Strong | Cyient |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Cyient
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company.
Cyient (3.8/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a utility wants network engineering and monitoring. If your situation matches that, Cyient is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Cyient FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Cyient?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team. Cyient's strongest advantage: long relationships with aerospace and rail OEMs.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Cyient differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. Cyient uses time and materials, managed service pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Cyient?
Cyient is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Cyient?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Cyient's primary differentiator is: broad engineering services with embedded work for heavy-industry clients. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 10,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive vs Aerospace, Rail and transport).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.