Indeema Software vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Indeema Software (4.2/5) edges ahead of Very (4.2/5) overall. Indeema Software is the better choice for IoT-focused boutique, firmware plus cloud. Very is the stronger option for funded US product teams, platform-heavy IoT. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Indeema Software vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Poland) | Bozeman, Montana, United States (distributed) |
| Team size | 50–200 | 150–250 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A company built around IoT from day one, with its own R&D hub | US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team | Time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $250,000 |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C, ESP32, nRF52 | Embedded C, Elixir, Nerves |
| Industries served | Smart home, Healthcare, Agriculture, Industrial equipment, Energy | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture |
Indeema Software vs Very: overview
Indeema Software
Volodymyr Shevchyk and Yaroslav Rubii founded Indeema Software in Lviv in 2014. It had more than 60 staff in 2022, when InSoft Partners founder Vitalii Gorovyi bought a minority stake, and directories now list 50 to 200 people. The company focuses on IoT development and runs an R&D hub in its Lviv office. It also co-founded IT courses with Lviv's Franko National University.
Very
Very was founded in 2011 by Ben Wald and started out building software and websites before settling on IoT. Its staff work remotely across the US, with Bozeman, Montana listed as its base, and Built In counts 193 employees. The company covers hardware prototyping, firmware, IoT platforms and apps. Its Clutch profile lists a $250,000 minimum project size and $200 to $300 hourly rates.
Services and capabilities: Indeema Software vs Very
| Capability | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Indeema Software vs Very
| Framework / platform | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Indeema Software vs Very
| Criterion | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $250,000 |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials | Time and materials, Team extension |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Indeema Software vs Very
| Dimension | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Smart home, Healthcare, Agriculture | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics |
| Best use cases | An agritech start-up needs LoRaWAN sensors and a dashboard., A smart home company wants ESP32 firmware and an app. | A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team., An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Time and materials |
Indeema Software vs Very: pros and cons
| Indeema Software | |
|---|---|
| + | IoT is its main business, not a side practice |
| + | Works across microcontroller firmware, cloud and mobile |
| + | Ukrainian rates |
| - | Small team with limited hardware design capacity |
| - | Most engineers are in Ukraine |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | US-based engineers and product managers |
| + | Strong on cloud platforms and data, not just devices |
| + | Experience taking products from prototype to launch |
| - | $250,000 minimum and $200 to $300 hourly rates rule out most small projects |
| - | Less electronics design depth than dedicated hardware houses |
Who should choose Indeema Software?
A typical fit: an agritech start-up needs LoRaWAN sensors and a dashboard.
A company built around IoT from day one, with its own R&D hub. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Smart home, Healthcare, Agriculture, Industrial equipment, Energy.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: a funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team.
US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Minimum engagement starts at $250,000. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture.
Decision matrix: Indeema Software vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Indeema Software |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Indeema Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Indeema Software (Not published) vs Very ($250,000) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Indeema Software |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Very |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Very |
Use case fit: Indeema Software vs Very
| Use case | Indeema Software fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| An agritech start-up needs LoRaWAN sensors and a dashboard. | Strong | Limited | Indeema Software |
| A smart home company wants ESP32 firmware and an app. | Strong | Limited | Indeema Software |
| A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team. | Limited | Strong | Very |
| An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | Limited | Strong | Very |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Limited | Strong | Very |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Indeema Software |
Verdict: Indeema Software vs Very
Indeema Software (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. A company built around IoT from day one, with its own R&D hub.
Very (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. If your situation matches that, Very is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Indeema Software vs Very FAQ
Is Indeema Software better than Very?
Indeema Software (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Indeema Software's strongest advantage: IoT is its main business, not a side practice. Very's strongest advantage: US-based engineers and product managers.
How do Indeema Software and Very differ in pricing?
Indeema Software uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. Very uses time and materials pricing with a minimum engagement of $250,000. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Indeema Software or Very?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Indeema Software and Very?
Indeema Software's primary differentiator is: a company built around IoT from day one, with its own R&D hub. Very's primary differentiator is: US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. They also differ in team size (50–200 vs 150–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs $250,000), and primary industries served (Smart home, Healthcare vs Industrial equipment, Energy).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.