ByteSnap Design vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
ByteSnap Design (4.4/5) edges ahead of Very (4.2/5) overall. ByteSnap Design is the better choice for UK hardware projects, ATEX and EV charging. Very is the stronger option for funded US product teams, platform-heavy IoT. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
ByteSnap Design vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | ByteSnap Design | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 | 2011 |
| HQ | Birmingham, United Kingdom | Bozeman, Montana, United States (distributed) |
| Team size | Under 50 | 150–250 |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | UK-based board and firmware design with services that continue after the product ships | US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering |
| Pricing model | Fixed price, time and materials | Time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $250,000 |
| Primary tech stack | PCB design, Embedded Linux, FPGA | Embedded C, Elixir, Nerves |
| Industries served | Industrial equipment, Automotive, Healthcare, Energy | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture |
ByteSnap Design vs Very: overview
ByteSnap Design
ByteSnap Design was set up in Birmingham in 2008 and works from Park Point in Longbridge. It designs printed circuit boards, embedded Linux and firmware, FPGA logic and low-power wireless products, including ATEX-rated designs for hazardous areas and EV charging controller boards. The team is under 50 people. In December 2025 it reported 13% turnover growth and launched an automated board-test service and an obsolescence management service.
Very
Very was founded in 2011 by Ben Wald and started out building software and websites before settling on IoT. Its staff work remotely across the US, with Bozeman, Montana listed as its base, and Built In counts 193 employees. The company covers hardware prototyping, firmware, IoT platforms and apps. Its Clutch profile lists a $250,000 minimum project size and $200 to $300 hourly rates.
Services and capabilities: ByteSnap Design vs Very
| Capability | ByteSnap Design | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: ByteSnap Design vs Very
| Framework / platform | ByteSnap Design | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: ByteSnap Design vs Very
| Criterion | ByteSnap Design | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $250,000 |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Time and materials, Team extension |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: ByteSnap Design vs Very
| Dimension | ByteSnap Design | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial equipment, Automotive, Healthcare | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics |
| Best use cases | A UK manufacturer needs an ATEX-certified sensor designed., An EV charging company wants a controller board and firmware. | A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team., An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Time and materials |
ByteSnap Design vs Very: pros and cons
| ByteSnap Design | |
|---|---|
| + | UK engineers handle both the board and the firmware |
| + | ATEX experience is rare and useful for oil, gas and chemical sites |
| + | Obsolescence management helps keep long-life products buildable |
| - | Small team, so large programmes will stretch it |
| - | Limited cloud and app development compared with full-stack vendors |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | US-based engineers and product managers |
| + | Strong on cloud platforms and data, not just devices |
| + | Experience taking products from prototype to launch |
| - | $250,000 minimum and $200 to $300 hourly rates rule out most small projects |
| - | Less electronics design depth than dedicated hardware houses |
Who should choose ByteSnap Design?
A typical fit: a UK manufacturer needs an ATEX-certified sensor designed.
UK-based board and firmware design with services that continue after the product ships. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Automotive, Healthcare, Energy.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: a funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team.
US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Minimum engagement starts at $250,000. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture.
Decision matrix: ByteSnap Design vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | ByteSnap Design |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: ByteSnap Design (Not published) vs Very ($250,000) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | ByteSnap Design |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Very |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | ByteSnap Design |
Use case fit: ByteSnap Design vs Very
| Use case | ByteSnap Design fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK manufacturer needs an ATEX-certified sensor designed. | Strong | Limited | ByteSnap Design |
| An EV charging company wants a controller board and firmware. | Strong | Limited | ByteSnap Design |
| A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team. | Limited | Strong | Very |
| An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | Limited | Strong | Very |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | ByteSnap Design |
Verdict: ByteSnap Design vs Very
ByteSnap Design (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. UK-based board and firmware design with services that continue after the product ships.
Very (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. If your situation matches that, Very is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
ByteSnap Design vs Very FAQ
Is ByteSnap Design better than Very?
ByteSnap Design (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ByteSnap Design's strongest advantage: UK engineers handle both the board and the firmware. Very's strongest advantage: US-based engineers and product managers.
How do ByteSnap Design and Very differ in pricing?
ByteSnap Design uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Very uses time and materials pricing with a minimum engagement of $250,000. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: ByteSnap Design or Very?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between ByteSnap Design and Very?
ByteSnap Design's primary differentiator is: UK-based board and firmware design with services that continue after the product ships. Very's primary differentiator is: US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. They also differ in team size (Under 50 vs 150–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs $250,000), and primary industries served (Industrial equipment, Automotive vs Industrial equipment, Energy).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.