ByteSnap Design vs Sirin Software: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
ByteSnap Design (4.4/5) edges ahead of Sirin Software (4.2/5) overall. ByteSnap Design is the better choice for UK hardware projects, ATEX and EV charging. Sirin Software is the stronger option for firmware and IoT apps at Ukrainian rates. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
ByteSnap Design vs Sirin Software: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | ByteSnap Design | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 | 2014 |
| HQ | Birmingham, United Kingdom | Florida, United States (R&D in Kyiv, Ukraine) |
| Team size | Under 50 | 50–200 |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | UK-based board and firmware design with services that continue after the product ships | US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team |
| Pricing model | Fixed price, time and materials | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | PCB design, Embedded Linux, FPGA | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, BLE |
| Industries served | Industrial equipment, Automotive, Healthcare, Energy | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment |
ByteSnap Design vs Sirin Software: overview
ByteSnap Design
ByteSnap Design was set up in Birmingham in 2008 and works from Park Point in Longbridge. It designs printed circuit boards, embedded Linux and firmware, FPGA logic and low-power wireless products, including ATEX-rated designs for hazardous areas and EV charging controller boards. The team is under 50 people. In December 2025 it reported 13% turnover growth and launched an automated board-test service and an obsolescence management service.
Sirin Software
Sirin Software was founded in March 2014 and has its R&D centre in Kyiv, with the company registered in Florida. A 2016 merger with Lampa Studio added mobile and web development. Directories now put the team at 50 to 200 people. Embedded systems, IoT and server-side software are its core business.
Services and capabilities: ByteSnap Design vs Sirin Software
| Capability | ByteSnap Design | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: ByteSnap Design vs Sirin Software
| Framework / platform | ByteSnap Design | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: ByteSnap Design vs Sirin Software
| Criterion | ByteSnap Design | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: ByteSnap Design vs Sirin Software
| Dimension | ByteSnap Design | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial equipment, Automotive, Healthcare | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home |
| Best use cases | A UK manufacturer needs an ATEX-certified sensor designed., An EV charging company wants a controller board and firmware. | A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app., A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
ByteSnap Design vs Sirin Software: pros and cons
| ByteSnap Design | |
|---|---|
| + | UK engineers handle both the board and the firmware |
| + | ATEX experience is rare and useful for oil, gas and chemical sites |
| + | Obsolescence management helps keep long-life products buildable |
| - | Small team, so large programmes will stretch it |
| - | Limited cloud and app development compared with full-stack vendors |
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Good balance of firmware and app development |
| + | US entity for contracting |
| + | Lower rates than Western European IoT firms |
| - | Delivery is concentrated in Kyiv, so continuity plans need checking |
| - | Limited circuit design capability |
Who should choose ByteSnap Design?
A typical fit: a UK manufacturer needs an ATEX-certified sensor designed.
UK-based board and firmware design with services that continue after the product ships. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Automotive, Healthcare, Energy.
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: a smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app.
US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment.
Decision matrix: ByteSnap Design vs Sirin Software
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | ByteSnap Design |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sirin Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: ByteSnap Design (Not published) vs Sirin Software (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | ByteSnap Design |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | ByteSnap Design |
Use case fit: ByteSnap Design vs Sirin Software
| Use case | ByteSnap Design fit | Sirin Software fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK manufacturer needs an ATEX-certified sensor designed. | Strong | Limited | ByteSnap Design |
| An EV charging company wants a controller board and firmware. | Strong | Limited | ByteSnap Design |
| A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app. | Limited | Strong | Sirin Software |
| A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | Limited | Strong | Sirin Software |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Limited | ByteSnap Design |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | ByteSnap Design |
Verdict: ByteSnap Design vs Sirin Software
ByteSnap Design (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. UK-based board and firmware design with services that continue after the product ships.
Sirin Software (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. If your situation matches that, Sirin Software is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
ByteSnap Design vs Sirin Software FAQ
Is ByteSnap Design better than Sirin Software?
ByteSnap Design (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ByteSnap Design's strongest advantage: UK engineers handle both the board and the firmware. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: good balance of firmware and app development.
How do ByteSnap Design and Sirin Software differ in pricing?
ByteSnap Design uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Sirin Software uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: ByteSnap Design or Sirin Software?
Sirin Software is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between ByteSnap Design and Sirin Software?
ByteSnap Design's primary differentiator is: UK-based board and firmware design with services that continue after the product ships. Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. They also differ in team size (Under 50 vs 50–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial equipment, Automotive vs Consumer electronics, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.