Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of N-iX (4.1/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected products needing hardware, firmware and cloud. N-iX is the stronger option for IoT platforms needing large data and cloud teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2002 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in London, Hamburg, Kraków) | Lviv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 200+ | 2,000–2,500 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company | Big cloud and data bench to put behind a device programme |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team | Dedicated team, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, RTOS, Embedded Linux | Embedded C/C++, AWS IoT, Azure IoT |
| Industries served | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment | Industrial equipment, Telecoms, Healthcare, Logistics |
Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Few IoT vendors can design the circuit board, write the RTOS firmware, program an FPGA and build the cloud back end without subcontracting part of it. Lemberg Solutions does all of that with 200+ engineers, working since 2007 from Lviv and Kraków with client-facing offices in London and Hamburg. Its connectivity and edge AI work is backed by partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics, plus an in-house lab for prototyping and testing. Clients include Bosch Rexroth, Astronics, Caltech, Cellink, Ferno and Speede.
N-iX
N-iX started in Lviv in 2002 and reports more than 2,400 engineers across Europe, the Americas and Asia-Pacific. Its IoT practice sits alongside data, cloud and enterprise work, and covers embedded software, connectivity and cloud platforms. The scale helps when a connected-product programme needs many cloud and data engineers. Most delivery is from Ukraine and Poland.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy | Industrial equipment, Telecoms, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard., An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | A manufacturer needs a data platform for millions of sensor readings., A logistics firm wants a fleet tracking back end. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help with early silicon access and vendor support |
| + | In-house lab shortens the loop between a prototype failing a test and a fix being tried |
| + | Builds products to the relevant industry standards and protocols, with ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification behind its security and quality processes |
| + | Edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need to decide locally instead of sending everything to the cloud |
| + | Client owns all intellectual property, including hardware designs |
| - | No in-house mass production; finished devices need a separate contract manufacturer |
| - | Regulatory approvals such as CE, FCC or medical clearances stay the client's job, though Lemberg prepares the technical files |
| - | A 200-person company can run several product teams in parallel but not a 100-engineer programme |
| N-iX | |
|---|---|
| + | Can scale cloud and data teams quickly |
| + | Good fit for platform-heavy IoT |
| + | Ukrainian and Polish rates |
| - | IoT is one practice among many, not the core business |
| - | No electronics design |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard.
Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose N-iX?
A typical fit: a manufacturer needs a data platform for millions of sensor readings.
Big cloud and data bench to put behind a device programme. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Telecoms, Healthcare, Logistics.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs N-iX (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | N-iX fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| A manufacturer needs a data platform for millions of sensor readings. | Limited | Strong | N-iX |
| A logistics firm wants a fleet tracking back end. | Limited | Strong | N-iX |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company.
N-iX (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a logistics firm wants a fleet tracking back end. If your situation matches that, N-iX is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs N-iX FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than N-iX?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team. N-iX's strongest advantage: can scale cloud and data teams quickly.
How do Lemberg Solutions and N-iX differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. N-iX uses dedicated team, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or N-iX?
N-iX is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and N-iX?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. N-iX's primary differentiator is: big cloud and data bench to put behind a device programme. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 2,000–2,500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive vs Industrial equipment, Telecoms).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.