Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Capgemini Engineering (3.9/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected products needing hardware, firmware and cloud. Capgemini Engineering is the stronger option for global manufacturers, compliance-heavy programmes. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1982 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in London, Hamburg, Kraków) | Paris, France |
| Team size | 200+ | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company | The largest engineering bench on this list, with factory and operational technology expertise |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team | Time and materials, managed service, outcome-based |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, RTOS, Embedded Linux | Embedded C/C++, AUTOSAR, Industrial protocols |
| Industries served | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment | Automotive, Aerospace, Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare |
Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Few IoT vendors can design the circuit board, write the RTOS firmware, program an FPGA and build the cloud back end without subcontracting part of it. Lemberg Solutions does all of that with 200+ engineers, working since 2007 from Lviv and Kraków with client-facing offices in London and Hamburg. Its connectivity and edge AI work is backed by partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics, plus an in-house lab for prototyping and testing. Clients include Bosch Rexroth, Astronics, Caltech, Cellink, Ferno and Speede.
Capgemini Engineering
Capgemini Engineering is the result of Capgemini's purchase of Altran, which closed in April 2020. Revelio Labs estimated around 64,700 employees in September 2025, down about 5% on the year. It combines Altran's engineering and R&D services with Capgemini's digital manufacturing work, and analysts pointed to Altran's operational technology skills as the reason for the deal. It is the strongest option here for large, compliance-heavy programmes.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Managed service, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy | Automotive, Aerospace, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard., An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | An aerospace firm needs certified embedded engineering., A manufacturer wants a smart factory rolled out across sites. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help with early silicon access and vendor support |
| + | In-house lab shortens the loop between a prototype failing a test and a fix being tried |
| + | Builds products to the relevant industry standards and protocols, with ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification behind its security and quality processes |
| + | Edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need to decide locally instead of sending everything to the cloud |
| + | Client owns all intellectual property, including hardware designs |
| - | No in-house mass production; finished devices need a separate contract manufacturer |
| - | Regulatory approvals such as CE, FCC or medical clearances stay the client's job, though Lemberg prepares the technical files |
| - | A 200-person company can run several product teams in parallel but not a 100-engineer programme |
| Capgemini Engineering | |
|---|---|
| + | Can run very large global engineering programmes |
| + | Factory and operational technology expertise from Altran |
| + | Mature compliance and quality systems |
| - | Headcount fell about 5% in 2025 |
| - | Slow and costly for small product teams |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard.
Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose Capgemini Engineering?
A typical fit: an aerospace firm needs certified embedded engineering.
The largest engineering bench on this list, with factory and operational technology expertise. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Aerospace, Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Capgemini Engineering (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Capgemini Engineering fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An aerospace firm needs certified embedded engineering. | Limited | Strong | Capgemini Engineering |
| A manufacturer wants a smart factory rolled out across sites. | Limited | Strong | Capgemini Engineering |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company.
Capgemini Engineering (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a manufacturer wants a smart factory rolled out across sites. If your situation matches that, Capgemini Engineering is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Capgemini Engineering FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Capgemini Engineering?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team. Capgemini Engineering's strongest advantage: can run very large global engineering programmes.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Capgemini Engineering differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. Capgemini Engineering uses time and materials, managed service, outcome-based pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Capgemini Engineering?
Capgemini Engineering is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Capgemini Engineering?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Capgemini Engineering's primary differentiator is: the largest engineering bench on this list, with factory and operational technology expertise. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive vs Automotive, Aerospace).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.