Integra Sources vs MobiDev: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Integra Sources (4.2/5) edges ahead of MobiDev (3.9/5) overall. Integra Sources is the better choice for budget hardware and firmware for start-ups. MobiDev is the stronger option for IoT apps with AI or AR features. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Integra Sources vs MobiDev: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Integra Sources | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2009 |
| HQ | Astana, Kazakhstan | Norcross, Georgia, United States |
| Team size | 30–60 | 250–450 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list | Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills |
| Pricing model | Fixed price, time and materials | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | PCB design, Embedded C, STM32 | Python, Computer vision, AWS IoT |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics |
Integra Sources vs MobiDev: overview
Integra Sources
Two hardware and software engineers founded Integra Sources in 2014, and it is based in Astana, Kazakhstan. The team is small, cited at 30 to 50+ people, and it designs electronics, writes firmware and builds IoT and embedded systems. Portfolio projects include an asset tracker, a robotic lawnmower and a pet camera. It reports more than 250 completed projects.
MobiDev
MobiDev was founded in 2009, opened a US office in Atlanta in 2011, and now lists its headquarters in the Atlanta area. Its engineering centres are in Chernivtsi, Ukraine, and Łódź, Poland. The team was 436 people in late 2022, and recent estimates are closer to 290. IoT is one of several practices next to web, mobile, AI and augmented reality.
Services and capabilities: Integra Sources vs MobiDev
| Capability | Integra Sources | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Integra Sources vs MobiDev
| Framework / platform | Integra Sources | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Integra Sources vs MobiDev
| Criterion | Integra Sources | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Integra Sources vs MobiDev
| Dimension | Integra Sources | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype., A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. | A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring., A factory needs computer vision quality checks. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Integra Sources vs MobiDev: pros and cons
| Integra Sources | |
|---|---|
| + | Low rates for both hardware and firmware |
| + | Hands-on prototype experience across many consumer devices |
| + | Accepts small fixed-price projects |
| - | Very small team |
| - | Kazakhstan location is unfamiliar to many procurement teams |
| - | Thin cloud platform capability |
| MobiDev | |
|---|---|
| + | AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT |
| + | US contracting entity |
| + | Cost-effective Ukrainian and Polish teams |
| - | Headcount appears to have fallen since 2022 |
| - | Little firmware or hardware depth |
Who should choose Integra Sources?
A typical fit: a start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype.
Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home.
Who should choose MobiDev?
A typical fit: a retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring.
Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics.
Decision matrix: Integra Sources vs MobiDev
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Integra Sources |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | MobiDev |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Integra Sources (Not published) vs MobiDev (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Integra Sources |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Integra Sources |
Use case fit: Integra Sources vs MobiDev
| Use case | Integra Sources fit | MobiDev fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype. | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
| A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
| A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring. | Limited | Strong | MobiDev |
| A factory needs computer vision quality checks. | Limited | Strong | MobiDev |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
Verdict: Integra Sources vs MobiDev
Integra Sources (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list.
MobiDev (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a factory needs computer vision quality checks. If your situation matches that, MobiDev is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Integra Sources vs MobiDev FAQ
Is Integra Sources better than MobiDev?
Integra Sources (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Integra Sources's strongest advantage: low rates for both hardware and firmware. MobiDev's strongest advantage: AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT.
How do Integra Sources and MobiDev differ in pricing?
Integra Sources uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. MobiDev uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Integra Sources or MobiDev?
MobiDev is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Integra Sources and MobiDev?
Integra Sources's primary differentiator is: electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. MobiDev's primary differentiator is: combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. They also differ in team size (30–60 vs 250–450), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Logistics vs Retail, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.