Etteplan vs Jaycon: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Etteplan (4.3/5) edges ahead of Jaycon (4.1/5) overall. Etteplan is the better choice for industrial machinery makers, Nordic buyers. Jaycon is the stronger option for design plus manufacturing from one vendor. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Etteplan vs Jaycon: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Etteplan | Jaycon |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1983 | 2011 |
| HQ | Espoo, Finland | Palm Bay, Florida, United States |
| Team size | 3,500–4,000 | 10–49 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company | Takes a device from industrial design to production runs, including enclosures |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, managed service | Fixed price, per-unit manufacturing pricing |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, PCB design | PCB design, Embedded C, nRF52 |
| Industries served | Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare, Automotive | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Smart home |
Etteplan vs Jaycon: overview
Etteplan
Etteplan is a Finnish engineering services company with around 3,800 to 4,000 staff in Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Denmark and China. Its Software and Embedded Solutions unit develops embedded software, electronics and IoT systems for industrial manufacturers. In March 2026 the company finished change negotiations in that unit covering 336 people in Finland and cut up to 28 jobs. It also does mechanical engineering and technical documentation, which is useful when a product needs more than electronics.
Jaycon
Jaycon was founded in 2011 and is based in Central Florida. It designs, prototypes and manufactures wireless and IoT hardware, with in-house injection moulding and circuit board assembly plus production capacity in China and Vietnam. The team is 10 to 49 people according to directories, it holds ISO 9001:2015 certification, and it made the 2025 Inc. 5000 list. It is a design partner of both Nordic Semiconductor and Silicon Labs.
Services and capabilities: Etteplan vs Jaycon
| Capability | Etteplan | Jaycon |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Etteplan vs Jaycon
| Framework / platform | Etteplan | Jaycon |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Etteplan vs Jaycon
| Criterion | Etteplan | Jaycon |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Managed service, Time and materials | Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Etteplan vs Jaycon
| Dimension | Etteplan | Jaycon |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | A machinery maker wants connectivity added to a product line., An energy company needs control electronics redesigned. | A start-up needs a wearable designed and manufactured., A brand wants a wireless sensor with an enclosure and a first production run. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Etteplan vs Jaycon: pros and cons
| Etteplan | |
|---|---|
| + | Can handle mechanical design and documentation as well as electronics |
| + | Public listing gives transparency on finances |
| + | Large Nordic industrial client base |
| - | Cut up to 28 jobs in its embedded unit in Finland in March 2026 |
| - | Heavier process and overhead than boutique IoT firms |
| Jaycon | |
|---|---|
| + | Handles manufacturing in-house, which most IoT software firms do not |
| + | Industrial and mechanical design as well as electronics |
| + | Nordic and Silicon Labs partner status |
| - | Small engineering team |
| - | Cloud platform and app work are limited |
Who should choose Etteplan?
A typical fit: a machinery maker wants connectivity added to a product line.
Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare, Automotive.
Who should choose Jaycon?
A typical fit: a start-up needs a wearable designed and manufactured.
Takes a device from industrial design to production runs, including enclosures. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Smart home.
Decision matrix: Etteplan vs Jaycon
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Etteplan |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Etteplan (Not published) vs Jaycon (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Etteplan |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Etteplan |
Use case fit: Etteplan vs Jaycon
| Use case | Etteplan fit | Jaycon fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A machinery maker wants connectivity added to a product line. | Strong | Limited | Etteplan |
| An energy company needs control electronics redesigned. | Strong | Limited | Etteplan |
| A start-up needs a wearable designed and manufactured. | Limited | Strong | Jaycon |
| A brand wants a wireless sensor with an enclosure and a first production run. | Limited | Strong | Jaycon |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Etteplan vs Jaycon
Etteplan (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company.
Jaycon (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a brand wants a wireless sensor with an enclosure and a first production run. If your situation matches that, Jaycon is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Etteplan vs Jaycon FAQ
Is Etteplan better than Jaycon?
Etteplan (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Etteplan's strongest advantage: can handle mechanical design and documentation as well as electronics. Jaycon's strongest advantage: handles manufacturing in-house, which most IoT software firms do not.
How do Etteplan and Jaycon differ in pricing?
Etteplan uses time and materials, fixed price, managed service pricing. Jaycon uses fixed price, per-unit manufacturing pricing pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Etteplan or Jaycon?
Etteplan is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Etteplan and Jaycon?
Etteplan's primary differentiator is: Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company. Jaycon's primary differentiator is: takes a device from industrial design to production runs, including enclosures. They also differ in team size (3,500–4,000 vs 10–49), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial equipment, Energy vs Consumer electronics, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.